
It's easy to see why the makers and distributors of The Dreamers opted to release it in America uncut, even though it meant the movie would be rated NC-17. The very obvious reason being that if you remove the sex, you are left with the hollow shell of a movie. To cover up this lack, the film is filled with lots of nudity, sex, masturbation, and incest. Perhaps the intent was to shock and titillate enough so that the other weaknesses of the movie would be ignored, but there's no escaping the fact that whenever the characters put their clothes on, the movie drags.
The story is set in Paris, 1968. Matthew (Michael Pitt), an American cinephile, and Leonardo DiCaprio look-alike, is befriended by a French brother and sister: Theo (Garrel) and Isabelle (Green). When their parents leave for an extended holiday by the sea, Theo and Isabelle invite Matthew to stay with them in their apartment. Once all three are ensconced, they immediately begin arguing over classic movies and engaging in various sexual acts, alone and together. That, in a nutshell, is the entire plot.
One of the pities of this movie is that it missed a great opportunity. Paris in 1968 was a hotbed of civil unrest. There were enough student riots, worker strikes, and clashes with the police to make a great movie. However, Bernardo Bertolucci would rather focus on the sex going on inside the apartment than on the activity in the outside world.
I think they made a mistake in not editing this movie for release. With so little plot, you feel every minute of its 2+ hours running time. To shorten its length and to preserve the only scenes worth watching, they should have cut out every moment where someone isn't naked.
You can call this movie art if you want to, but it's just well-lit porn, and personally, I'd rather do without the fancy lighting and watch the real thing.


















