
Live and Let Die is Roger Moore's first appearance as 007. It is also one of the worst Bond movies in the entire franchise. To be fair, this isn't really Moore's fault, for large chunks of the film he's a non-entity, particularly in the long boat chase. The movie is too long, too jokey, and just plain stupid in parts. If you compare this movie to From Russia with Love, it's hard to believe they're even in the same series.
I've never been a Roger Moore as Bond fan, but I was determined to watch this with an open mind and try to see some positives in it. I could only come up with two things. One is the fact that the villain's plot this time doesn't involve S.P.E.C.T.R.E., and doesn't involve holding the world for ransom. Kananga's big scheme is to simply take over the heroin trade in the USA. The other thing I enjoyed was the funky 70s soundtrack, which is integrated well into the movie. Some of the early Bonds hadn't figured out how to mix music into the movie and usually just ended up blaring the Bond theme at odd moments. Not here though.
Other than that the move is a slapstick mess. It's just a series of set piece and chase scenes with very little plot connecting them. The worst scene in the whole movie is a 20 minute long boat chase where a Southern Sheriff named J.W. Pepper (who's straight out of stereotypes 101) has a bigger part than Bond. Bond is shown every few minutes driving his boat, but most of the chase involves this idiot sheriff crashing cars and making stupid comments. The fact that this chase begins by Bond escaping from a swamp by running across a line of crocodile's backs is just another spit in the face to fans of the real James Bond. They could have accomplished two things by cutting this chase out. It would have shortened this movie and helped Bond maintain some of his dignity.
Moore isn't given much chance to show his charms, but when he does he comes across as rather effete and far too delicate to be an action hero. He is actually two years older than Sean Connery, which seems pretty stupid. If you're going to recast the central role, why not go for a younger actor. Although, that's a mistake that hurts the later Moore films more as he actually looks younger than Connery here. He is so effeminate at times though, that if he wasn't sleeping with so many women you'd think he was gay. I mean whose idea was it to have him smoke a long brown cigar in a couple of scenes when all of the villains in the movie are black?
Even the Bond girl is a disappointment. Jane Seymour, making her debut here, is attractive enough; quite beautiful actually, but her character is a complete wuss. It's funny that ten years after the first Bond movie, this Bond girl is less liberated than the first one.
I know that not all of Roger Moore's movies are as bad as this one, and to some, although I can hardly believe it, Moore is their favorite Bond. As a Sean Connery fan and a fan of the Ian Fleming novels, to me this movie represents everything that was wrong with the Bond films of the 1970s.


















