
I'm not sure why, but from the minute I first saw the previews for this movie, I really wanted to see it. I think it's simply a case of clever marketing on top of a good premise.
The teen movie genre, so complete with its stereotypical characters and stock situations, is certainly ripe for satire. The posters and even the film's website played up the different characters and these situations. We are presented with the Popular Jock, the Cocky Blonde Guy, the Pretty Ugly Girl, the Cruelest Girl, the Bitchy Cheerleader, the Token Black Guy, the Obsessed Best Friend, the Stupid Fat Guy, the Desperate Virgins, and the Foreign Exchange Student. Add these characters to a plot that is ripped from the latest teen movie; the popular jock makes a bet that he can turn the pretty ugly girl into the prom queen and you have a great set-up for a satire.
However, the clever set-up seems to be as far as the makers of this movie got with the execution. Despite moments of hilarity, most jokes, even the funny ones, miss the mark of true satire, and instead rely on shock value alone to provoke laughs. Take the opening scene, which is both funny and shocking. The pretty ugly girl is masturbating with her 'lil pink vibrator', which is anything but little, when first her father, then her brother, then her grandmother, then the priest, and finally the family dog, all burst in on her. It's her birthday and the grandmother is even carrying a cake. The dog pulls the blanket off her and the vibrator goes flying through the air and lands on top of the cake. This joke sets the tone and should pretty much give you an idea of the level of humor this movie is on.
There are a few scenes which actually spoof the genre without relying on shock. When it comes time to turn the pretty ugly girl into a beauty, the girl giving her the makeover studies her for a long moment, and then says, "I know!", and then removes the girl's glasses and takes her hair out of the ponytail and voila, she's beautiful! And at the Prom, after everyone on the dance floor suddenly breaks into perfect synchronized dancing, one of the guys on the sidelines quips, "Who'd have guessed that every student at this school was secretly a professional dancer!"
Other scenes in the movie are tributes to the teen movies of the eighties without satirizing at all. There is a scene in the library which is based on The Breakfast Club, only instead of satirizing it, it is simply a recreation of the exact same scene, even down to the set and features the same actor playing the principal as the original. There's no real point to this scene, except the initial chuckle of recognition.
Other humorous moments which have little to do with satire include a big production number before the Prom. I don't remember too many of those in the teen movies of the 80s or the 90s. The makers of this movie also rely heavily on nudity to provoke cheap laughs. The female Foreign Exchange student spends the entire movie naked and an opportunity to show tits is never passed up. This seems particularly out of place in a film supposedly satirizing some of the most innocent movies ever made. Any sex in a John Hughes movie was only talked about, and I don't remember nudity in any of them.
So while in the long run, this movie is funny, it misses a great opportunity to truly spoof the genre in anything approaching an intelligent or witty way. Instead it relies on way too much bathroom humor and crude, shock jokes.


















