
Chaplin is a competently made film with a very strong central performance that helps elevate the material. It's a reverential look at one of Hollywood's founding artistic geniuses that hits the highlights of Chaplin's life like a checklist (even if it does get some of its facts wrong and some dates muddled), but fails to capture the magic of his talent. Perhaps worst of all, for a movie about one of the great comedy masters of cinema, the story is told in a very somber tone, as if Chaplin's life was an epic tragedy.
The story covers nearly all of Chaplin's life, beginning in 1894, when Chaplin was five, and ending in 1972, five years before his death. That's a lot of ground to cover and even at 144 minutes, there's not enough time to show enough detail. Characters are introduced and dismissed at a rapid speed, particularly Chaplin's many wives, who are never given much of a chance to develop as characters. The most entertaining segments are Chaplin's Hollywood years and the story and the audience would have been better served if the focus had been kept within that time frame. Perhaps starting with his arrival in California and ending with the release of The Great Dictator in 1940.
Despite the stories' many weaknesses, I cannot say enough about Robert Downey Jr. as Chaplin. His Oscar (and many other awards) nominated performance is one of the greatest dramatic accomplishments of his career. Just 27 years old when the movie was released, he believably plays Charlie at all stages of his life, with the help of some great aging makeup. His accent and mannerisms are perfect, even when playing the iconic Little Tramp. He's so good that when clips of the real Chaplin are shown in several places during the movie, you never question that they're the same person.
Although this is Downey Jr.'s movie and his Chaplin is the only truly well rounded character, there are a few performances that manage to get noticed. Kevin Kline infuses some life into the story as Douglas Fairbanks. Chaplin's interactions with him and Mary Pickford, along with some early scenes with Dan Aykroyd as Mack Sennett, are some of the most entertaining and those are the kinds of scenes I wanted more of. We never see or hear of anything else going on in Hollywood outside of Chaplin, which would have been more interesting to me than the story's determination to paint Chaplin as a persecuted and tortured artist. He may have been that, but he must have had some moments of happiness, but you'd be hard pressed to find those moments here.
Visually the movie is well done. The different time periods are faithfully reproduced. Hollywood is mostly orange groves when Chaplin arrives and we catch glimpses of its expansion. In one memorable scene we get to see Kline's Fairbanks climbing the Hollywood sign when it still spelled out Hollywoodland.
Chaplin was a master at generating laughs and tugging at the heartstrings. He knew how to make audiences laugh and cry, often at the same time. This movie manages to convey the facts of his life, but without ever generating anything close to the emotion Chaplin did in his greatest work. It's a movie that might be of interest to fans of the great comic, but as entertainment it ultimately fails.






















