
Making an audience cry when your movie is about a teenage girl with cancer finding first love with a teenage boy with cancer, is like shooting fish in a barrel. However, it's also very easy to become a schmaltzy Lifetime movie of the week with such a plot. The Fault in Our Stars manages to mostly avoid the problem, but when it does become schmaltzy, as it increasingly does as it progresses, it doesn't hold back. It's the central performance by Shailene Woodley, whose career is beginning to seriously heat up, that really holds everything together and makes the plot's biggest sins a bit more forgivable.
Although it opens with a voice-over narration by Shailene as Hazel saying how real life cancer isn't like a movie, the plot plays out very much exactly like a movie. Hazel is a teenager whose cancer is currently in remission, but only because of an experimental medicine. Her lungs are permanently damaged and she is constantly on oxygen. At a support group she is forced into going to by her mom, she meets Gus (played by Ansel Elgort who recently starred in Divergent also with Shailene), a cancer survivor who lost a leg to the disease. They strike up a friendship that gradually leads to love. However, given the nature of the story and the fact that these are two young lovers with the potential of dying of cancer, you just know that it will end tragically and with the audience reaching for their tissues.
The story of these two lovers is touching and heartfelt. It's even often quite humorous. When the tears come, and they do come, they come as sincerely as they do because Shailene Woodley has made Hazel such a real person. Ansel does an okay job as Gus, but he never feels as fully developed as Hazel. During its opening weekend, exit polls showed that the audiences were 82% female and it seems the filmmakers were guessing it would be so. The male characters are all there to support Hazel. Although to be fair, even the only other main female character, Hazel's mom, played by an under-used Laura Dern, is strictly there to react to her daughter.
Some of the film's biggest problems come late in the story. There's a spontaneous kissing scene that results in applause by those watching that is truly groan inducing. And while I'm sure living with a terminal disease gives you a deeper perspective on life, you don't necessarily assume that teenagers will be able to articulate that perspective as well as these two. They are able to express their love for each other in terms that are quite beautiful and eloquent, but in no way that you would ever hear in real life. It's a highly romanticized style that goes against the grain of those opening statements that imply this story won't be like a movie.
As I mentioned, the supporting characters are never fully developed. Hazel's parents are given particular short shrift. They are played very generically and with bland sweetness. There's one scene near the end that tries to give them a touch of depth, but they only exist in the plot via their relationship with Hazel. And Gus's parents are even flatter. Even Gus's life revolves around his girlfriend. Willem Dafoe, who plays Hazel's favorite author, is a bit of a contradiction and feels more like a plot point than a person.
How much you enjoy this movie will depend upon your tolerance of emotional manipulation. I'm honest enough to admit that I got a bit misty-eyed by the film's conclusion, but I also groaned a few times. One thing that is certain however, is that Shailene Woodley's career advancement seems to be inevitable. She has that girl next door charm going for her and the ability to generate empathy from her audience.


















