
It is rare that a movie can be so bad that I do not get all the way through it. When in Rome is that exception. Even the most romantic parts of my brain could not bring itself to find something worth enjoying. I would rather watch a Kristen Stewart marathon than even part of this movie again.
Beth is every cliche that has ever appeared in a Hollywood romantic comedy. She is an attractive, intelligent, pleasant enough New York business woman, and of course unlucky in love. While attending her sisters wedding in Rome she finds herself attracted to the best man. When she sees him kissing another woman she decides to get drunk and steals five coins from a fountain.
Each coin was thrown in by some love lorn guy. As soon as she plucked them from the fountain they all instantly fell in love with her, even though, she has not met any of them. However, they all happen to live in New York and know exactly what she looks like. They pop up every where to flirt with her, but they are all so inept at it, that they end up just harassing her. The best man calls her and she brushes him off without a question.
This is where I turned it off. No doubt if she would have just given him a moment to explain about the girl in Rome everything would have been solved. The guys flirting with Beth are pathetic, and not in a funny way. As in Leap Year, and many other recent romantic "comedies," Beth is a little klutzy. She angers her in-laws at the wedding by not being able to complete a tradition of breaking a vase.
Beth is such a stereotype that I did not care if she fell in love or died alone. No doubt she will end up with Duhamel, and he will have some pointless excuse for kissing the girl in Rome. The crazy stalkers will realize they do not really love her, or maybe that would have all been a dream. Either way, I again have no interest in how that is resolved. There are dumb movies and then there is When in Rome.

















