
On the surface Into the Woods seems like an ideal Disney vehicle. After all it takes 4 well known fairy tales and intertwines them together. However, this is a darker story than your typical Disney tale, harkening back to the original Grimm source material. This movie version, produced by Walt Disney, retains some of that darkness, but reduces it, most notably the sexual elements of the original stage version. That, coupled with a cast made up of stars known more for their names than their singing ability, produces a neutered musical that manages to entertain without producing any real "Wow!" moments.
The plot centers on a childless baker (James Corden) and his wife (Emily Blunt). To undo a curse put upon them by the witch (Streep) who lives next door, they must venture into the woods and collect 4 items. These 4 items lead them into contact with Little Red Riding Hood, Cinderella, Rapunzel, and Jack of the beanstalk fame. There are princes, step-mothers, magic beans, giants and other of the usual fairy tale trappings. And while this plot seems rather childish, there are dark elements and a couple of deaths. The woods of the title serve as a metaphor and there are themes revolving around growing up, parents, children, and what happens when your wishes come true.
Directed by Rob Marshall (the Oscar nominated director of Chicago) from the Tony Award winning musical by Stephen Sondheim, the film certainly has potential. Unfortunately, it never fully realizes that potential.
Once again Hollywood has made casting recognizable faces a priority over casting singers in a musical. Something it has been doing for decades. This renders most of the songs in the film fairly weak. Streep's witch gets some of the best songs in the original musical, but Streep (as I thought she forever proved in Mamma Mia) is no singer no matter how much treatment the sound department can do for her. Kendrick, of the main cast, has the strongest voice. Corden as the Baker seems to be speaking his songs at times. Blunt, who is by no means a great singer, still manages to acquit herself well as the Baker's wife and generates the most emotion.
Perhaps most surprising is how the film fails to open up the sets to any great degree. Despite being on film, the woods setting remains rather claustrophobic apart from a few scenes. Disney hasn't exactly gone hog wild with the special effects. Even the giant is kept half hidden among the trees with its CGI seams showing.
In a nod to its potential younger audience, the film has also removed most of the sexual content. Red Riding Hood and Jack have both been made younger for the film and the sexual innuendos between Red and the wolf have been removed. This removes the underlying meaning of Red's songs. And it goes without saying that the wolf suit worn on stage, complete with prosthetic penis, is nowhere to be seen. A later sexual tryst between two other characters is also played down and left more to the viewer's imagination. Other changes include the removal of the narrator and the mysterious stranger along with several songs, including one of my personal favorites, "No More", which is sung by the Baker and his father.
I'm curious as to how this movie will fare at the box office. It's too dark, with a downer of an ending, to appeal to the Frozen crowd. And yet that's exactly the audience most likely to be intrigued by the marketing. Even if it appeals to the hardcore Broadway audience it seems unlikely to find mainstream success.


















